Skip to content

Executive Order 12425, How They Will Watch and Keep It From You

January 2, 2010

It is now thanks to Mr. Obama, that we the true American patriots must be very careful of what actions we take. No I am not talk of anything unlawful. However, I am talking about what we say, write, or any action you may take against this administration.

On December 21,2009, Obama signed a revision of Executive Order 12425. (E.O. 12425) This order exempts an organization straight out of an old WWII war movie from any U.S. laws any restrictions. The organization is not even a United States law enforcement agency, it is INTERPOL. Yes, it is the agency most new of from late night war flicks, or the Nazi comic books. However, it is very real.

What the “Divine Leader” has done is turned over your sovereignty
to the International Police. This move allows the administration to do the exact opposite of what they said they would do, create transparency.

Instead of hearing of the things that E.O. 12425 will allow this President and his administration to get away with, not to mention that we will be watched over by an international organization. The MSM is telling us that Obama treated his daughters to some shaved ice, and they took in a movie, while in Hawaii. “Well, isn’t that special?” I at least thought the Glenn Beck’s and other talk show persons would be screaming this from the mountain tops. However as I said above, they too might be picking carefully what they attack the Obama administration over.

Obama’s revision of this Reagan E.O. gives some very scary powers to Interpol. While exempting them from search and seizure, it allows the U.S. government to move documents to Interpol where they will be out of the reach of the Freedom of Information Act. Also because the E.O. does not allow Interpol’s actions to be questioned, the watch dog powers of the Congress do not apply in this instance.

Should we be worried about this Executive Order?

In the past, I have argued the point with certain people that an Executive Order is power that the Congress doesn‘t vote on. When Obama took office I felt that if he did a way with, Presidental Directive 51, and a few other P.D.’s and E.O.’s that were putin place by George W. Bush, I would give him the benefit of the doubt. As we know he did not. Certain people were jumping up and down, when the MSM put out that he did away with some of G.W. Bush’s “Signing Statements”. When the truth is, Signing Statements have on power, they are just what the name suggest, “Signing STATEMENTS”. Obama did not do anything about P.D. 51, just as I said he wouldn’t. The power he will get from P.D. 51 is that of a dictator. Also, coupled with E.O. 12425, and other Orders and Directives to numerous to mention, he becomes King. “King Obama.” Gee, how’s that Obama thing working out for you?

ABA

Other articles on this and deserve your attention are:

1. Why Interpol Immunity
2.Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425 (White House)
3.Placing INTERPOL Beyond The Reach Of American Law
4.A new Executive order. Does this make you more or less afraid?
5.Directive 51

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. Spencer Cleeb permalink
    September 1, 2010 12:21 pm

    hmmmm, let’s see, executive order 12425 was instituted by whom and in what year? By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.
    So, that would mean that a Republican put this in to effect and I’m not sure what the problem is with deleting the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), and the use of a semicolon being inserted in to the e.o. It seems that all “Republican” and “Democrat” presidents that have followed since 1983 have had no problem with this, so why do you, except that you just want to try and manipulate people with your half-truths and just out right lies. If you’re going to try and manipulate people then you need to use less speculations and apply more facts.

    Like

  2. Ross Wolf permalink
    January 23, 2010 6:13 pm

    President Obama’s Executive Order EO 12425 put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution, beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement.

    Why has Obama allowed foreign law enforcement to operate in the U.S. free of Constitutional safeguards that protected Americans, until now? Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.” That appears Key: Obama’s executive order will allow U.S. police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by working with INTERPOL in criminal and Civil investigations e.g., ;since the Patriot Act passed, several European Countries entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the U.S. In 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. U.S. Government never disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of warrant-less collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by U.S. Government.

    Just prior to 9-11 Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it is problematic INTERPOL working with U.S. law enforcement and private government contractors will want access to telecom/NSA and other government wiretaps perhaps illegal, to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws.

    Thanks to Obama, U.S. Police can now use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to share in assets seized from Americans.

    Like

Let us know what you think.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: